Analysis of the ethical dilemma using the ACS Code of Conduct
Correctly maps all the ethical issues, within the case, to the relevant sections of the Code (including section numbers).
Comprehensively analyses the identified ethical issues from the point of view of the Code.
Makes a clear, convincing and a justifiable recommendation/s
Demonstrates a breadth and depth of understanding of the Code by articulating its deeper and more subtle aspects through the recommendation/s provided.
Adequately maps the ethical issues, within the case, to the correct sections of the Code (including section numbers).
The analysis properly explains the link between the ethical issues and the relevant sections of the Code.
The recommendation/s made is reasonable and is supported with a well expressed justification
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the Code.
Makes a genuine attempt at mapping the ethical issues, within the case, to the correct sections of the Code (including section numbers).
The analysis explains to some extent the link between the ethical issues and the elements of the Code.
The recommendation/s made are clear and a good attempt is made to support it with a justification.
Demonstrates a good understanding of the Code.
Few ethical issues, within the case, are correctly mapped to the right sections of the Code (including section numbers).
The analysis does not explain well the link between the ethical issues and the elements of the Code.
The recommendation/s made makes sense but is not supported with a justification
Demonstrates some evidence of understanding of the Code.
Incorrectly maps the ethical issues, within the case, to the sections of the Code (including section numbers).
The analysis of the ethical issues in light of the elements of the Code is poor.
The recommendation made makes no sense
Demonstrates little evidence of understanding of the Code.