Read the case notes attached. What evidence is there that Kane was a holder in due course? How do rules of law play into the court’s reasoning? Are there ambiguities present in these rules of law? What ethical value guided this conclusion?
Read the case notes attached. What evidence is there that Kane was a holder in due course? How do rules of law play into the court’s reasoning? Are there ambiguities present in these rules of law? What ethical value guided this conclusion?